(The Economist) The vindictiveness of China’s rulers betrays their nervousness

Like so much else under Heaven, repression in China has often seemed to go in cycles. Every now and then it has suited the country’s leaders to relax their steely grip on the country and allow a modicum of political liberty.

Freer criticism in the media has helped give the party a veneer of credibility. Lip-service to the law and due process has won plaudits overseas and boosted the economy at home. So a thaw would set in for a while, a “Beijing spring”. A freeze would always follow. But, until lately, in each new cycle the springs were seeming warmer and the freezes not quite so harsh. When the country was starting to liberalise, Westerners justified doing business with China on just such grounds. More economic openness would surely lead to more openness of other kinds.

The latest freeze casts this widespread hope into doubt, for three reasons. The first is the scale of the crackdown. Ai Weiwei, China’s best-known artist and dissident, who was detained at Beijing airport on April 3rd, is only the most notable figure to be caught by it. Calls on the internet for a “jasmine revolution” have prompted armed police and plain-clothes goons to descend in huge numbers on public places to stop people from “strolling”, as a veiled form of protest.

Read it all.

print

Posted in * Culture-Watch, * Economics, Politics, * International News & Commentary, Asia, China, Law & Legal Issues, Politics in General

2 comments on “(The Economist) The vindictiveness of China’s rulers betrays their nervousness

  1. kmh1 says:

    The evolution of “communist” China is just what George Orwell prophesied in Animal Farm.

  2. MichaelA says:

    Pray for the Anglican Primates of the Global South who meet with Chinese leaders in September.